Betekenis van:
scale of measurement


Voorbeeldzinnen

  1. In 7A101 the measurement of "bias" and "scale factor" refers to a one sigma standard deviation with respect to a fixed calibration over a period of one year;
  2. The total measurement error, including the cross sensitivity to other gases (see annex 4, appendix 5, paragraph 1.9.), must not exceed ± 5 per cent of the reading or ± 3,5 per cent of full scale, whichever is smaller.
  3. In 7A101.a. the measurement of "bias" and "scale factor" refers to a one sigma standard deviation with respect to a fixed calibration over a period of one year; 3. In 7A101.a.
  4. The analyser shall not deviate from the nominal calibration point by more than ± 2 % of the reading over the whole measurement range except zero, or ± 0,3 % of full scale whichever is larger.
  5. A "resolution" over their full scale of 0,1 μm or less (better); and b. A "measurement uncertainty" equal to or less (better) than (0,2 + L/2000) μm (L is the measured length in mm);
  6. A "scale factor"'repeatability' of less (better) than 1250 ppm; Note: 7A101.a. does not specify accelerometers which are specially designed and developed as MWD (Measurement While Drilling) Sensors for use in downhole well service operations. Technical Notes: 1. In 7A101.a. 'missile' means complete rocket systems and unmanned aerial vehicle systems capable of a range exceeding 300 km; 2. In 7A101.a. the measurement of "bias" and "scale factor" refers to a one sigma standard deviation with respect to a fixed calibration over a period of one year; 3. In 7A101.a.
  7. Relative positions of the flat end of the ram and the edge of the headform shall be shown on a graduated scale, on which a mobile index shall register the maximum measurement achieved when the apparatus is moved away from the item tested.
  8. Article 2(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84 provides that the grading of pig carcases must be determined by estimating the content of lean meat in accordance with statistically proven assessment methods based on the physical measurement of one or more anatomical parts of the pig carcase; the authorisation of grading methods is subject to compliance with a maximum tolerance for statistical error in assessment; this tolerance was defined in Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2967/85 of 24 October 1985 laying down detailed rules for the application of the Community scale for grading pig carcases [2].
  9. Article 2(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84 provides that the grading of pig carcases must be determined by estimating the content of lean meat in accordance with statistically proven assessment methods based on the physical measurement of one or more anatomical parts of the pig carcase. The authorisation of grading methods is subject to compliance with a maximum tolerance for statistical error in assessment. This tolerance was defined in Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2967/85 of 24 October 1985 laying down detailed rules for the application of the Community scale for grading pig carcases [2].